MUMBAI: Indian
companies
transacting with related parties such as foreign parents or group
companies may find themselves badly hit with the proposed transfer
pricing provisions and also those relating to thin capitalisation, as it
would result in a higher
income tax
(I-T) outgo. A fresh slew of litigation arising from these issues cannot be ruled out.

The proposed transfer pricing rules can be illustrated.For example, Company A, based in Bengaluru, provides software development services to its US parent. It operates on a cost plus 10% margin (say Rs 110 is reimbursed by parent for its services). The transfer pricing officer says the profit margin should be higher at 20%. Company A, if it accepts this upward adjustment, currently has to pay tax on the additional Rs 20. This adjustment is called primary adjustment.
The Budget proposals provide that Company A and US parent will need to record this primary adjustment if it exceeds Rs 1 crore in respective books of accounts. This recording is called a secondary ad justment. However, if the Indian company does not accept the adjustment made by transfer pricing authorities and opts for litigation, secondary adjustment does not apply . Vijay Iyer, transfer pricing leader at EY says: “If the amount relating to the primary adjustment is not repatriated to India by the foreign related party within the time limit (yet to be prescribed), it shall be treated as a loan given by the Indian company . A notional interest on such loan will be computed. If the taxpayer does not invoice and collect the sum, interest may continue to accrue.“ Hitesh Gajaria, chartered accountant and transfer pricing specialist, points out that the unintended adverse consequences and the possibility of double taxation.
“Such notional interest will be taxable income in the hands of the Indian company , on which it would pay tax at 30% plus surcharge and cess. The US parent may not face any deduction, either for the upward adjustment (Rs 20 in the illustration) or the notional interest -both of which it would record in its books. It is not clear how the Indian company or the transfer pricing official would be able to influence what the US parent would record in books of account. The proposed income tax amendment may need to be harmonised with India's foreign exchange regulations, under which cross-border loans are tightly governed.“
Transfer pricing, thin capitalisation decoded
Transfer
pricing in essence calls for an arm's length pricing between related
parties. Thus, if Company A, which is a captive in India, provides
software development to its parent in the US, the price it charges needs
to be at arm's length (the same price it would charge to third
parties). Transfer pricing provisions ensure that revenue is properly
captured in the source country (which in this case is India). Thin
capitalisation rules by limiting the amount of interest that can be
claimed as a tax deduction if loans are from related parties deter
income tax arbitrage. This is because interest is allowed as a deduction
for computing taxable profits. A company is said to be thinly
capitalised when the level of its debt is much greater than its equity
capital. TNN
India Inc: Budget impact: New arm's length norms, interest restrictions will hit India Inc
Assinar:
Postar comentários (Atom)
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário